{"id":54754,"date":"2025-04-03T11:13:54","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T11:13:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/?p=54754"},"modified":"2025-04-03T11:13:57","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T11:13:57","slug":"controversial-old-fulwood-road-redevelopment-decision-delayed-as-residents-voice-objections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/2025\/04\/03\/controversial-old-fulwood-road-redevelopment-decision-delayed-as-residents-voice-objections\/","title":{"rendered":"Controversial Old Fulwood Road redevelopment decision delayed as residents voice objections"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A decision on whether a \u00a354 million housing development planned for a former NHS site in Fulwood can go ahead has been delayed due to months of opposition, with residents raising concerns over the scale of the project and its environmental impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The proposal, submitted in November 2023 by Expresso properties, aims to demolish the 1950s office block on Old Fulwood Road and replace it with 15 houses, a seven-storey apartment building, and six apartments within the Old Fulwood House. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, Sheffield City Council has since requested an extension until May 2025 to decide on the application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As of March 2025, 166 objections have been made surrounding the plans for the site, which borders the Fulwood Conservation Area and overlooks Mayfield Valley. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One unnamed resident of Fulwood, said: \u201cI\u2019m not against apartments going up, but what I am against is the height of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cBuilding a monstrosity just outside the conservation area is just ridiculous.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But another resident, Steven James, saw the plans as an improvement. He said: \u201cIt\u2019s a bit of an eyesore currently.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response to the objections against the site, he said: \u201cPeople are always against change\u2026 once it\u2019s been here for a few years, people will be okay with it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Local councillor Andrew Sangar has backed objections, referring to the loss of up to 80 trees and raising doubts about the promised green spaces. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He said: \u201cIt is particularly disappointing to be losing a number of healthy trees.\u201d Coun Sangar questioned whether proposed green walls would be effectively maintained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In an online statement, referring to the buildings, the developers said: \u201cThey will nestle into the landscape.\u201d They added that the development would enhance the area\u2019s aesthetic while minimising environmental harm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Their viability analysis estimates a \u00a35.5 million profit on the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But residents remain divided, with one saying: \u201cI don\u2019t think it&#8217;s NIMBYism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI think what we are trying to do is protect the environment and the walk down the valley is beautiful.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A decision on whether a \u00a354 million housing development planned for a former NHS site in Fulwood can go ahead has been delayed due to months of opposition, with residents raising concerns over the scale of the project and its environmental impact. The proposal, submitted in November 2023 by Expresso properties, aims to demolish the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":55692,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[636,137,152,8,5,10,132,156],"tags":[968,560,235,12,55],"class_list":["post-54754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-council","category-council-2","category-health","category-news","category-politics","category-top-stories","category-top-story-3","tag-expresso-properties","tag-fulwood","tag-nhs","tag-sheffield","tag-sheffield-city-council"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54754"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55726,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54754\/revisions\/55726"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shef-live.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}